Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

VJVirtual | The future of assessing brain tumors with CSF-based liquid biopsies

Stephen Bagley, MD, MSCE, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, suggests that integrating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection into therapeutic clinical trials for glioblastoma and other brain cancers could lead to the development of biomarkers and shed light on its usefulness for guiding patient care. Prospective, systematically designed studies that collect tumor tissue, blood, and CSF at multiple time points will be needed to further evaluate the concordance, as well as sensitivity and specificity of these compartments in detecting mutations. This interview was recorded via an online conference call with The Video Journal of Oncology (VJOncology).

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think that one of the directions that’s relatively low-hanging fruit is, you know, in the context of our therapeutic clinical trials for glioblastoma and other types of brain cancer, we should be integrating cerebrospinal fluid collection more regularly because that would give us an opportunity to actually start to have much larger banks of samples and be able to test some assays in the setting of a therapeutic trial...

I think that one of the directions that’s relatively low-hanging fruit is, you know, in the context of our therapeutic clinical trials for glioblastoma and other types of brain cancer, we should be integrating cerebrospinal fluid collection more regularly because that would give us an opportunity to actually start to have much larger banks of samples and be able to test some assays in the setting of a therapeutic trial. And you can imagine that’s an atmosphere that’s ripe for biomarker development. It will start to shed additional light on whether this can actually be useful or not for guiding patient care. So that’s an easy thing to do is to just build some cerebrospinal fluid sample collection into our therapeutic trials. I think the other area that is important is we need more prospective, systematically designed studies to really, we would call this a matrix study, which means you want to compare multiple different tissues. So maybe at the same exact point in time for a patient with glioblastoma, you would collect tumor tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid all at the same time. And you would do that two or three times during the course of their disease. And at each one of those time points, you could truly get a sense of, you know, how, what is the concordance between these three compartments in terms of picking up mutations? You would get good numbers in terms of what is the sensitivity and specificity of both blood and cerebrospinal fluid compared to tissue. And we have studies that have done this to varying degrees, but none that have really been a decent sample size with very systematic collection of all of these pre-analytical variables that we talked about. So we’re working on designing such studies, but that is what I think we really need to be able to start to have discussions about developing assays that could eventually be FDA approved and things like that.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...