Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Gastrointestinal Cancer Channel is supported with funding from Gilead Sciences (Silver) and Revolution Medicines (Silver).

VJOncology is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ASCO GI 2026 | Optimizing treatment with perioperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer

Marcel Verheij, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, highlights the current standard of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer and the importance of considering toxicity and tolerability when determining the best treatment approach for patients. Further studies are needed to identify subgroups of patients who benefit from specific therapies and to investigate whether intensification of pre-operative treatment can improve response rates and potentially eliminate the need for surgery in some cases. This interview took place at the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium in San Francisco, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So perioperative chemotherapy is a current standard. And I think that toxicity and tolerability of the treatment should guide the best way of treating patients. For those patients who tolerate the chemotherapy poorly, you can consider providing a different approach, for example, chemoradiotherapy. But I guess that all new approaches should come from studies. So we need to do more studies to identify subgroups of patients who benefit from a certain therapy...

So perioperative chemotherapy is a current standard. And I think that toxicity and tolerability of the treatment should guide the best way of treating patients. For those patients who tolerate the chemotherapy poorly, you can consider providing a different approach, for example, chemoradiotherapy. But I guess that all new approaches should come from studies. So we need to do more studies to identify subgroups of patients who benefit from a certain therapy. If patients respond very well to pre-operative therapy, then the question is whether those patients really need post-operative treatment or whether surgery is sufficient for those patients. So I guess future directions in relation to Critics 2 will be investigating whether a further intensification of pre-operative treatment is possible and now in the era of immunotherapy it would be a logical step to evaluate whether we can incorporate immunotherapy in a pre-operative regimen in order to further increase the response rate to pre-operative treatment. And maybe certain patients don’t need surgery anymore if the treatment is so good that patients do not require surgery anymore.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...