Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Skin Cancer Channel is supported with funding from Iovance Biotherapeutics (Silver).

VJOncology is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ESMO 2026 | FcγR3A germline polymorphism and anti-PD-1 outcomes in melanoma

Ines Pires da Silva, MD, PhD, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia, discusses the association between a high-affinity FcγR3A germline single nucleotide polymorphism and outcomes with anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma, using data from the NADINA (NCT04949113) trial of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus adjuvant nivolumab. Carriers of the variant allele had poorer event-free and distant metastasis-free survival in both arms. This interview took place at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2026 Congress in Madrid, Spain.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Yeah, so that’s studied by the NKI group. And what they did was to first assess the genotype, right? We have these three possibilities. So we have the FF, which is the most common, almost 50% of the patients. So phenylalanine in both. And then we have the FV, and that’s when one of them is replaced by valine. And we have the VV, so valine, right? So that one, that is VV, it’s only in 11% of the patients in the general population, and in both arms of the NADINA trial, so the adjuvant arm, nivolumab monotherapy, and neoadjuvant, ipilimumab, okay, neoadjuvantly, in both arms, they saw, in fact, a shorter event-free survival in the patients, a smaller group, of course, so 11%, that they have the genotype VV...

Yeah, so that’s studied by the NKI group. And what they did was to first assess the genotype, right? We have these three possibilities. So we have the FF, which is the most common, almost 50% of the patients. So phenylalanine in both. And then we have the FV, and that’s when one of them is replaced by valine. And we have the VV, so valine, right? So that one, that is VV, it’s only in 11% of the patients in the general population, and in both arms of the NADINA trial, so the adjuvant arm, nivolumab monotherapy, and neoadjuvant, ipilimumab, okay, neoadjuvantly, in both arms, they saw, in fact, a shorter event-free survival in the patients, a smaller group, of course, so 11%, that they have the genotype VV. So it’s very interesting. The hypothesis is that that variant, that polymorphism, leads to a high affinity receptor. So NK cells, that are the innate immune cells that have that receptor when they have this variant has more higher affinity and they hypothesize that they bind to the nivolumab that is or anti-PD1 that is in fact blocking the T-cells are important right and they that basically that will deplete those cells but those cells are the important ones for the response. So in this case, we see it has a deleterious effect. What is not clear to me, and again, this is very preliminary. I think beautiful data goes a little bit, again, not against, but it’s a bit controversial compared to what we know about the Fc enhancement. But that’s what we like. We want data to challenge what we know because the clinical data is clear, clear cut there’s no question how to put that in the context of what we know that’s what we have to learn right but beautiful data they also showed that all these like it’s we need the treatment to make all the changes of gene expression and in terms of the NK cell and macrophages scores so basically at baseline we don’t see much difference in terms of immune regulators in expression but after treatment we see a distinct big distinction in terms of those patients that have the VV genotype or the FF genotype so beautiful data but I think we need a bit more functional to understand exactly how we can utilize this it’s not clear to me also if this is predictive of treatment or prognostic because could be just prognostic not just like very important but those are the questions that I believe that the team will answer

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Choose your cookie settings

VJOncology uses necessary cookies to make the site work. With your permission we'd also like to use analytics, preference and marketing cookies to understand how the site is used and improve it.

Choose an option to continue. You can change it at any time on our Cookie Policy page, linked at the bottom of every page.