Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Gastrointestinal Cancer Channel is supported with funding from Revolution Medicines (Silver).

VJOncology is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ESSO 45 | Multidisciplinary approaches to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in dMMR colon cancer

Alberto Puccini, MD, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy, discusses the evolving landscape of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for colorectal cancer, acknowledging ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment strategies such as short-term doublet versus long-term monotherapy regimens. A multidisciplinary team approach must incorporate dMMR status assessment before resection to identify high-risk patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This interview took place at the 2026 European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) Annual Meeting in Madrid, Spain.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So this is a tough question, actually...
So this is a tough question, actually. And we discussed yesterday in our session together with the fellow oncologists and surgeons, because this is the matter of debdate. We saw incredible benefit of immunotherapy, in the neoadjuant setting in several studies with a very high percentage of pathological pre-response and also DFS. We know from NICH2, but many other trials. We now facing the challenge that we don’t know exactly which is the best treatment strategies, whether it’s a doublet for a short period or a monotherapy for a long period. Probably the best way is going to be the first. But we don’t have strong data. To define which is the best, because actually we see very important results with all these strategies. I think from a clinical point of view, we have to have a strong multidisciplinary team, where oncologists, radiologists, surgeons have the DMMR status before resection, and they can discuss together whether the patient has a high risk, so not positive. And in that case, I believe that the neoadjuvant will work. It will give the most benefit. Whether we decide to go to resection first, because we believe it’s a low risk patient, but we see at the pathology afterwards a high risk stage 3, we can actually implement the ATOMIC strategy with FOLFOX Plus atezolizumab, which is now FDA approved, is not still European and approved. So, it’s not. It’s not still globally approved, but it can be a strategy.

Read more...

Choose your cookie settings

VJOncology uses necessary cookies to make the site work. With your permission we'd also like to use analytics, preference and marketing cookies to understand how the site is used and improve it.

Choose an option to continue. You can change it at any time on our Cookie Policy page, linked at the bottom of every page.