Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Gastrointestinal Cancer Channel is supported with funding from Gilead Sciences (Silver) and Revolution Medicines (Silver).

VJOncology is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ESMO 2025 | FOOTPATH: NAPOLI and mFOLFOX6 in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer

Benedikt Westphalen, MD, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany, discusses the Phase II FOOTPATH study (NCT03487016) of first-line treatment strategies in metastatic pancreatic cancer. The study compared gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, NAPOLI (liposomal irinotecan and 5-FU/folinic acid), and sequential NAPOLI followed by mFOLFOX6. Sequential NAPOLI/mFOLFOX6 improved progression-free survival and showed a trend toward longer overall survival compared with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, while NAPOLI monotherapy did not. This interview took place at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2025 Congress in Berlin, Germany.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

What we found in FOOTPATH was that if you sequence FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, you retain a good efficacy in terms of progression-free survival, but you also have lower toxicities. So your patients, upon being progressive on the first line regimen, still have reserves in terms of bone marrow reserve or polyneuropathy to go on to other treatment regimens. And also looking into the future, we’re now talking about combining RAS inhibitors and novel agents with frontline chemotherapy...

What we found in FOOTPATH was that if you sequence FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, you retain a good efficacy in terms of progression-free survival, but you also have lower toxicities. So your patients, upon being progressive on the first line regimen, still have reserves in terms of bone marrow reserve or polyneuropathy to go on to other treatment regimens. And also looking into the future, we’re now talking about combining RAS inhibitors and novel agents with frontline chemotherapy. If you’re stacking up multiple agents, chemo plus targeted agents, it might really get a little bit toxic. If you know that you can split at least a chemotherapeutic backbone and top that up with a targeted agent, that could be informative for the future.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...