Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ASCO 2026 | Phase II study of ipatasertib plus pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of R/M HNSCC

Jacob Thomas, MD, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, discusses the results of a randomized Phase II study (NCT05172258) comparing single-agent pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab with ipatasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), highlighting that the response rate improved to 41% with the combination compared to 17% with single-agent pembrolizumab. This interview took place during the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting in Chicago, IL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So single-agent pembrolizumab is the standard of care for a recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Historically, response rates are very modest, 19%. And so there’s been efforts to improve upon that over the past several years. So our study is one of those efforts. It was a randomized phase two study with a comparator arm of single-agent pembrolizumab comparing to a combination arm of pembrolizumab plus ipatasertib...

So single-agent pembrolizumab is the standard of care for a recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Historically, response rates are very modest, 19%. And so there’s been efforts to improve upon that over the past several years. So our study is one of those efforts. It was a randomized phase two study with a comparator arm of single-agent pembrolizumab comparing to a combination arm of pembrolizumab plus ipatasertib. Ipatasertib is an oral AKT inhibitor. It was dosed on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. What we saw is that the response rate improved to 41% with the combination compared to 17% in the single agent arm, which tracks with historical data. So this is exciting. It’s a small study, only 52 patients. So further study needs to be done to identify whether there’s a subset that would benefit from this. but we’re very excited for these results.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...