Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

VJVirtual | Comparing CSF biomarker & blood-based assays in brain tumor monitoring

Cecile Riviere-Cazaux, PhD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, comments on the challenges and opportunities in using plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as liquid biopsy sources for brain tumor biomarkers. The blood-brain barrier limits the detection of brain tumor biomarkers in plasma, resulting in lower sensitivity, and that CSF bypasses this issue but has its own limitations. As technologies develop and more experience is gained, the dynamics between plasma and CSF will become clearer, and both can be used complementarily to monitor disease progression. This interview was recorded via an online conference call with The Video Journal of Oncology (VJOncology).

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

It’s a great question. Really, a lot of the research in the field for brain tumor biomarkers and liquid biopsies up to this point has been in plasma. There’s been a limitation of the fact that there’s a blood-brain barrier, which limits the amount of brain tumor biomarkers that can make their way into circulation. And so sensitivity has often been limited up to, you know, even up to 50% of detection...

It’s a great question. Really, a lot of the research in the field for brain tumor biomarkers and liquid biopsies up to this point has been in plasma. There’s been a limitation of the fact that there’s a blood-brain barrier, which limits the amount of brain tumor biomarkers that can make their way into circulation. And so sensitivity has often been limited up to, you know, even up to 50% of detection. So the idea of using plasma for disease monitoring in patients with brain tumors has really been challenging. And so because of that, I don’t know that we necessarily have a great response yet in terms of what do the dynamics look like in plasma compared to CSF. I think CSF, one of its benefits is that it does bypass that issue of the blood-brain barrier, but it also has its own limitations in terms of tumor to CSF contact, which is not something that plasma has to deal with. But I think, you know, as we gain more and more experience with either plasma or CSF as liquid biopsy sources and as technologies develop, I think we’ll be able to answer that question more clearly. There are some really exciting technologies and tools like AmpliSeq and plasma that I think, you know, our group has demonstrated tracks really well with disease burden and can even predict disease progression weeks and months before it occurs. Still, you know, small sample sizes, still working on developing those assays out and validating them in more patients. But I think we’ll see, hopefully, that there are similarities in the dynamics between the two. And that really, as we have more tools available in both plasma and CSF, they can be used complementarily. So for example, if we’re trying to see disease progression around a resection cavity, well, CSF can likely capture that very well. But if there’s disease progression happening away from the resection cavity or away from a CSF space, then in that case, we’ll need some really strong plasma tools because plasma can more, you know, fully sample all areas of the brain and the tumor than CSF can. So still a lot of unanswered questions there in terms of dynamics, but it’s a really exciting space to be in, especially as we have more and more tools to be able to look at both CSF and plasma for biomarkers in these patients.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...