So, I think the main message we had for the community was to please use the new molecular resources and all the results that have been coming out in the recent years. So, in particular, in our study in 2023, we advocated for using additional markers that could be useful to stratify the patients to better understand why some patients respond to treatment, like why some don’t, like why some have a good prognosis, etc...
So, I think the main message we had for the community was to please use the new molecular resources and all the results that have been coming out in the recent years. So, in particular, in our study in 2023, we advocated for using additional markers that could be useful to stratify the patients to better understand why some patients respond to treatment, like why some don’t, like why some have a good prognosis, etc. So, we really think that they should embrace this. We showed a bit like all these results – we have the kid in particular to use estimates of the ploidy of the tumor, looking at the microenvironment on top of the morphology, and also look at the methylation level in the CpG islands. So, these four things we showed in the study that are very important to understand the differences between the patients. At the same time, we started to mention ways for researchers and clinicians to estimate these values. So, trying to advance a bit so it’s easier to implement in research settings and also in the clinic. Trying to look at different ways of doing this. So, we propose some ways for bioinformaticians to do it first. We’re trying to advance also for having some more simple biomarkers for our clinicians to use. And also, we are investigating the use of AI to just be able to, from a single whole slide image that is scanned, be able to infer all these values without needing to do any fancy molecular techniques, but just from the image infer directly the molecular classification.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.