Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

SABCS 2025 | Strategies to overcome CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in breast cancer

Seth Wander, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, discusses the need for a personalized approach in the post-CDK4/6 setting, as a one-size-fits-all strategy is unlikely to be effective due to diverse mechanisms of resistance. Understanding individual patient-level resistance mutations is important to identify suitable treatments, such as next-generation cell cycle regulatory blockers or targeted therapies, and emerging sequencing technologies can help dynamically change therapy as new dependencies emerge. This interview took place at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) 2025 Meeting in San Antonio, TX.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

One of the things that I think has become increasingly apparent to those of us who’ve been working in this field now over the last five to 10 years is that it’s unlikely that a one-size-fits-all approach is going to work in this post-CDK4/6 setting because there are such diverse mechanisms. We have some of the cell cycle regulatory elements that we just talked about...

One of the things that I think has become increasingly apparent to those of us who’ve been working in this field now over the last five to 10 years is that it’s unlikely that a one-size-fits-all approach is going to work in this post-CDK4/6 setting because there are such diverse mechanisms. We have some of the cell cycle regulatory elements that we just talked about. We have some of the oncogenic signal transduction pathways that we talked about. Now, there is some overlap between those things, inhibitors, next-generation cell cycle regulatory blockers, for example, aurora kinase inhibitors. And so I think we have to have an understanding at each individual patient level of what some of these resistance mutations might be so that we can identify either currently available drugs or clinical trial opportunities for patients to participate in that make sense based upon the genomic and molecular changes that are happening in the tumor. In the same way that we recognize ESR1 as a measurement or a surrogate for ER dependence and as a marker of potential response to next-generation antiestrogens, we need to take that logic into the post-CDK4/6 space to help identify patients who should go on CDK2 blockade, patients who should go down the road of AKT-PI3 kinase blockade, patients who may be better suited for RAS or MAP kinase, FGFR, HER2 targeting therapies. And I think we’ll have examples of all of those. And again, that may change over time. If you have one dependency and you target that, a new dependency might emerge later. That again, we need to repeat the process and think about deploying some of our emerging sequencing technologies to dynamically change therapy in these patients. Of course, we have opportunities for ADC therapy and chemotherapy, but that comes with more toxicity, with requirements for IV treatment, et cetera. And so we’d like to be able to use oral, well-tolerated, targeted drugs that I think are better suited to the individual molecular and genomic changes in specific patients.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...