The treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer has been concurrent chemo and radiotherapy for 25 years and we also see that there hasn’t been much improvement in survival looking at the population-based studies. Approximately one third of patients are cured so there’s definitely a need for better treatment. We know that immunotherapy when added to chemotherapy prolonged survival in extensive stage small cell lung cancer...
The treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer has been concurrent chemo and radiotherapy for 25 years and we also see that there hasn’t been much improvement in survival looking at the population-based studies. Approximately one third of patients are cured so there’s definitely a need for better treatment. We know that immunotherapy when added to chemotherapy prolonged survival in extensive stage small cell lung cancer. And we also know from studies of locally advanced and non-small cell lung cancer that immunotherapy consolidation after chemotherapy improves survival. So that was the background and I think based on those data it was quite natural for us to move on with a study design like in this trial. Overall there was no difference in survival between the experimental group those patients who received atezolizumab and those who were randomized to observation. There was maybe a little indication of an effect looking at the PFS curves, but that difference was also not statistically significant. So overall, we didn’t find any benefit of the atezolizumab in this setting.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.