Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ASCO 2025 | The evolving field of genomic profiling in prostate cancer

Emmanuel Antonarakis, MD, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, shares insight into the field of genomic profiling for prostate cancer. A prospective biomarker study found that high levels of PSMA-positive tumor cells were linked to worse survival and poor response to lutetium-177 PSMA-617. Other markers, such as B7-H3 on extracellular vesicles, also indicated poor outcomes, reflecting greater tumor burden and resistance and highlighting the potential to utilize tumor genetics to guide more personalized treatments. This interview took place during the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting in Chicago, IL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Our second interesting abstract at ASCO 2025 was presented by first author Dr Ali Arafat, and this was a prospective biomarker study where we collected blood specimens from 100 consecutive patients who were eligible for lutetium-177, PSMA-617. The study was designed to assess the circulating tumor cell PSMA positivity and the PSMA protein detection in extracellular vesicles, also known as EVs...

Our second interesting abstract at ASCO 2025 was presented by first author Dr Ali Arafat, and this was a prospective biomarker study where we collected blood specimens from 100 consecutive patients who were eligible for lutetium-177, PSMA-617. The study was designed to assess the circulating tumor cell PSMA positivity and the PSMA protein detection in extracellular vesicles, also known as EVs. So let’s talk about the first part. At baseline, in the patient’s blood sample, those patients who had a high abundance of circulating tumor cells that expressed PSMA on their surface, in other words, PSMA positive circulating tumor cells, a higher number of those was paradoxically associated with an unfavorable overall survival to lutetium-177, PSMA-617. So more CTCs that express PSMA potentially as a measure of increased tumor burden, those patients will do worse on lutetium PSMA 617. The second thing that we did was we developed for the first time a blood-based EV proteomic analysis using a method called shotgun proteomics using mass spectrometry where we could identify in blood more than 10,000 unique EV-related proteins including PSMA and some other of our favorite cell surface targets in prostate cancer such as V7H3, Trop2, and also STEAP1. So first focusing on the EV detection of PSMA, patients that had blood-based EV high detection of PSMA at the protein level also had an inferior, worse survival to lutetium PSMA617. And interestingly enough, a number of other cell surface proteins, which are sometimes called the surface zone, also correlated with a worse survival as well. And those proteins included STEEP1, which is an energy-regulated protein, B7H3 which has been of great interest recently for multiple therapeutics and also trope 2 which has also been the target of some antibody drug conjugates so higher expression of PSMA in the blood derived from EVs associated with worse prognosis to lutetium of PSMA 617 and that worse prognosis was also found with high EV trope 2 levels, high EV steep 1 levels, and high EV B7H3 levels. In the future, we hope to be able to use a blood test to not just understand the number of circulating tumor cells, but also to quantify prostate cancer relevant proteins, including cell surface proteins in the prognosis of prostate cancer in the context of various systemic therapies. Thank you.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...