I mean, the background of this study is very solid. The LITESPARK-015 study is built upon the results of the LITESPARK-004 study. The LITESPARK-004 study focused on patients with VHL disease. So all patients had germline mutations of the VHL gene, so they got the VHL disease. And if you look at the overall response rate in the subgroup of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, well, that is the kind of waterfall plot that we will always like to see in medical oncology...
I mean, the background of this study is very solid. The LITESPARK-015 study is built upon the results of the LITESPARK-004 study. The LITESPARK-004 study focused on patients with VHL disease. So all patients had germline mutations of the VHL gene, so they got the VHL disease. And if you look at the overall response rate in the subgroup of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, well, that is the kind of waterfall plot that we will always like to see in medical oncology. With a lot of complete responses, you can really see the tumors melting because of the treatment. So that was the background. That was the basis for this new trial that enrolled patients with the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. In this study, patients didn’t need to have a VHL mutation. VHL mutations were investigated only locally and only two patients out of 70 enrolled patients had a VHL mutation. The overall response rate is 10%. And in particular, it is worth mentioning that two patients with the VHL mutation got a response. The progression-free survival is 3.9 months, which is similar to the progression-free survival in the placebo arm of, for example, the cabozantinib trial. So my point is Belzutifan per se may not be an active treatment, at least alone, for the treatment of patients with pancreatic NETs. Perhaps in the future, we need to combine Belzutifan with other agents, in particular, in my opinion, multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.