There have been a late-breaking abstract on the patients with HCC. And for those patients after surgery, there have been a WES-powered MRD to detect the circulating tumor DNA in the plasma. So what key result from this study is that, first, the detection of the ctDNA, which is MRD, was associated with the worst outcome in terms of recurrence-free survival as compared to those patients without the detectable circulating tumor DNA...
There have been a late-breaking abstract on the patients with HCC. And for those patients after surgery, there have been a WES-powered MRD to detect the circulating tumor DNA in the plasma. So what key result from this study is that, first, the detection of the ctDNA, which is MRD, was associated with the worst outcome in terms of recurrence-free survival as compared to those patients without the detectable circulating tumor DNA. And they also showed that for those with a ctDNA-negative group, the adjuvant therapy for HCC after surgery did not improve the survival benefit. So there’s a room for the escalation of the adjuvant therapy in this good prognostic ctDNA-negative group. On the other hand, for those ctDNA-positive group, the use of the adjuvant therapy was associated with a better recurrence-free survival as compared to the surveillance group. So meaning that there’s a room for escalation of the therapy in the ctDNA-positive group. So I think that this is a potentially important study because the use of the personalized treatment or MRD, while it has been studied in other cancer types like colon cancer or lung cancer, it has not been formally studied in liver cancer. So this study highlights the potential of developing an RCT-comparative adjuvant versus no adjuvant in the ctDNA-positive subgroup. And I think a multi-center study is required for future development.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.