Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ESMO 2025 | De-escalating bone modifying agents

Terry Ng, MD, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, discusses the clinical or biological factors that might help identify patients who can safely de-escalate or discontinue bone modifying agents, noting that this question remains to be explored and was not specifically addressed in the Phase IV REaCT-Hold BMA trial (NCT04549207). Dr Ng mentions that the study did not pre-stratify cohorts based on burden of bone metastases, but notes that about 35% of patients in both arms had visceral metastases, which is an adverse prognostic factor. This interview took place at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2025 Congress in Berlin, Germany.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think that question remains to be explored. React-Hold BMA was not specifically designed to look at that. We did not pre-stratify our cohorts based on burden of bone metastases, for example. About 35% in both arms had visceral metastases, which we know is an adverse prognostic factor. So I think it would be considered safe even if patients had visceral metastases, for example.

This transcript is AI-generated...

I think that question remains to be explored. React-Hold BMA was not specifically designed to look at that. We did not pre-stratify our cohorts based on burden of bone metastases, for example. About 35% in both arms had visceral metastases, which we know is an adverse prognostic factor. So I think it would be considered safe even if patients had visceral metastases, for example.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...