Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Gastrointestinal Cancer Channel is supported with funding from Gilead Sciences (Silver) and Revolution Medicines (Silver).

VJOncology is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ASCO GI 2026 | Adjuvant immunotherapy in HCC and risk stratification challenges

Stephen Lam Chan, MD, FRCP, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, discusses the findings of recent studies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including the IMbrave050 study (NCT04102098), and notes that immune checkpoint inhibitors may not be effective in the adjuvant setting. High-risk population may not be as high-risk as previously thought, as evidenced in the KEYNOTE-937 (NCT03867084) trial, which means that the current criteria for defining high risk may be inadequate. This interview took place at the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium in San Francisco, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think there’s two messages. The first we gathered this study and also the previously we presented the IAM BRAVE 050 study. Probably the immune checkpoint inhibitors are not working really well in terms of adjuvant setting for SCC. Another observation we can observe from these two studies is that the so-called high-risk population is actually not that high-risk...

I think there’s two messages. The first we gathered this study and also the previously we presented the IAM BRAVE 050 study. Probably the immune checkpoint inhibitors are not working really well in terms of adjuvant setting for SCC. Another observation we can observe from these two studies is that the so-called high-risk population is actually not that high-risk. For example, in the Keynote039 study, we can see that at the 48-month time, around 80% of patients either in the control arm, placebo, or the adjuvant pembrolizumab arm still survive, so which means that maybe the criteria to define this high risk are not adequate to really reflect the high risk phenotype or actually nowadays the subsequent treatment, the salvage treatment, like surgery, local regional therapy, or even systemic therapy, can kind of salvage many recurrences afterwards. So this actually will help guide us in the future design and development strategy for the adjuvant study. But I think overall in the future the field is more moving towards the neoadjuvant or the perioperative approach.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...