So the paper and abstract presented here at World Lung is iza-bren. The original study was a phase one study in escalation where they identified the toxicities and got to the MTD. This was the expansion cohort. 81 patients were enrolled and looked at three different doses, 1.5, 2, and 2.5, to really optimize this before going forward in a phase three study. What we found was that the response rates were about the same...
So the paper and abstract presented here at World Lung is iza-bren. The original study was a phase one study in escalation where they identified the toxicities and got to the MTD. This was the expansion cohort. 81 patients were enrolled and looked at three different doses, 1.5, 2, and 2.5, to really optimize this before going forward in a phase three study. What we found was that the response rates were about the same. There was slightly higher progression-free survival and duration of response at the 2.5 milligram per kilogram dose level. So that’s the dose decided on to go forward now in the randomized clinical study, which will be iza-brennversus chemotherapy post-osimertinib. One of the other things we’re obviously looking at is toxicity and side effects, and what we found there were no new safety signals. And in the earlier study, it was found that patients did a little bit better with growth factors, so growth factor was mandatory in this expansion cohort and will be in the future expansion cohorts.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.