Educational content on VJOncology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ESMO Asia 2025 | Early intervention and treatment response in managing cachexia

Abhirup Chanda, MBBS, MD, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India, highlights the importance of early intervention in treating cancer-related cachexia. While there is no proven study to show that early intervention improves outcomes, it is still crucial for symptomatic management. Patient responses to primary systemic therapy additionally play a significant role in determining the final outcome. This interview took place at 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Asia Congress in Singapore, Singapore.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Yes, so uh for early intervention, so there is no study proven as that if you intervene early that would help, but having said that, uh, all these cancers, like in the metastatic stage, CA stomach or CA lung or CA of the hepatopancreatic structures, all these things generally they have a median survival of around 12 months, like if we have the data from all over the world...

Yes, so uh for early intervention, so there is no study proven as that if you intervene early that would help, but having said that, uh, all these cancers, like in the metastatic stage, CA stomach or CA lung or CA of the hepatopancreatic structures, all these things generally they have a median survival of around 12 months, like if we have the data from all over the world. So, before the advent of immunotherapy, it used to be ranged between 6 to 12 months only. So, you tend to intervene early in terms of the symptomatic management of anorexia and all those things. But again, the final outcome, a lot of it depends on how your patient is doing on the treatment for the specific diagnosis. Because if your patient has responded to the primary systemic therapy, they seem to be doing much better than those who have progressed on your primary systemic therapy. So, however, while you try in those patients using all these medicines, either megestrol acetate or olanzapine, or these days we have a few more groups of drugs as well, they don’t really seem to be doing much good to the patient, neither in terms of survival, nor in terms of symptomatic management.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...