I think it will become more common because the intratumoral approach may have sounded a little bit strange for the big pharma companies in the beginning. They are used to giving something intravenously. But when you build stronger and stronger vaccines, in a way, I mean it could be viruses, but it could also be mRNA or something else, then you don’t want to have it everywhere in the body...
I think it will become more common because the intratumoral approach may have sounded a little bit strange for the big pharma companies in the beginning. They are used to giving something intravenously. But when you build stronger and stronger vaccines, in a way, I mean it could be viruses, but it could also be mRNA or something else, then you don’t want to have it everywhere in the body. I mean, when you give a vaccination to someone, you give it in the arm, and then you hope to protect against an infection of the lungs. And I think that’s where we need to get with these types of treatments for cancer, that we can inject one tumor to get an immune response that is systemic. Then we will also spare the patients from a lot of side effects when you treat the whole body and not just the tumor.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.