The HERTHENA-Lung02 study is a randomized Phase III study comparing a HER3-DXd which is an ADC against HER3 versus a standard chemotherapy for patients who had resistance to standard third-line, first-generation EGFR TKI after oral treatment. So there are two types, is either the patient who took the EGFR third generation as a first-line therapy, or it can be as a second-line therapy after they failed their first generation T790M positive and go on third generation...
The HERTHENA-Lung02 study is a randomized Phase III study comparing a HER3-DXd which is an ADC against HER3 versus a standard chemotherapy for patients who had resistance to standard third-line, first-generation EGFR TKI after oral treatment. So there are two types, is either the patient who took the EGFR third generation as a first-line therapy, or it can be as a second-line therapy after they failed their first generation T790M positive and go on third generation. Randomized head-to-head, total of 563 patients, and randomized with the primary endpoint of looking at the Burke progression-free survival, and for which we do have a positive outcome of a hazard ratio of 0.74. However, the median is actually very close, 5.6 versus 5.4 months. In the response rate, there is actually improved response rate by approximately 10%. However, the overall survival is negative. There is actually a hazard ratio of 0.94, no different in the overall survival. Toxicity-wise, there’s actually a slightly higher GI and hematological toxicity. So that has to be adjusted with some support, but it’s a manageable situation. So overall, we do have an improvement in response rate, improvement in progression-free survival, but no difference in overall survival.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.