We have many patients that at the end, for a variety of reasons, cannot be addressed to the standard of care, the most aggressive combination of chemo and radiation. So traditionally we had only one option, especially if they are not a candidate for chemo, it was radiation alone. But with radiation alone the problem is that it’s very tolerable, it’s safe, but the overall survival, median overall survival is around 10 months...
We have many patients that at the end, for a variety of reasons, cannot be addressed to the standard of care, the most aggressive combination of chemo and radiation. So traditionally we had only one option, especially if they are not a candidate for chemo, it was radiation alone. But with radiation alone the problem is that it’s very tolerable, it’s safe, but the overall survival, median overall survival is around 10 months. So it’s very poor and we wanted to offer something more and we want to offer something more in these days but we cannot intensify treatment with traditional drugs so our logical choice is to add immunotherapy because it’s better, especially for patients who have biomarkers such as PD-L1 positive cancers or in any case do low-dose chemotherapy and maybe also low-dose radiation therapy very precisely targeting the tumor and following the patients at our best with also our colleagues from the pulmonology department etc to minimize toxicity because quality of life is very important for this kind of patient it’s important for all but for sure for this patient population is crucial
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.